Non-Compete Clauses in Employment Contracts in Israel

There is significant uncertainty surrounding non-compete clauses in employment contracts, both among employees and employers. In this article, an Israeli labor law expert from our firm explains the legal framework as established by legislation and court rulings.

Our law firm, with offices in Jerusalem and Tel Aviv, specializes in labor law. We provide legal advice and representation for employees and employers on topics such as employment agreements and non-compete clauses, employee rights, severance pay, and more.

What Can Be Included in a Non-Compete Clause?

A non-compete clause stipulates that after employees leave a workplace where they agreed to a non-compete clause in their employment contract, they are prohibited, for a certain period, from competing with their former employer. This restriction could prohibit, for example, employment with a competing company or establishing a competing business by the former employee.

What Does the Law Say?

Israeli law recognizes an employee’s fundamental right to engage in any lawful occupation. This right, enshrined in the Basic Law: Freedom of Occupation, cannot be unreasonably restricted. Additionally, the Contracts Law states that the terms of a contract may include anything mutually agreed upon by the parties. However, the law permits intervention in contractual agreements, such as in cases where a contract is deemed illegal or contrary to basic public norms.

Courts Require Justifying Circumstances for Non-Compete Clauses

Courts have established guiding principles for evaluating non-compete clauses in employment contracts. A landmark ruling on this issue was delivered in the early 2000s, coinciding with the rapid growth of Israel’s high-tech industry. Many employment contracts in this field included non-compete clauses, sometimes for years after termination. The Supreme Court ruled that non-compete restrictions, by themselves, cannot be considered a legitimate employer interest. In the absence of such a legitimate interest, the clause limiting employees’ right to work for other employers after leaving their job will not be enforceable.

However, if former employers demonstrate justifying circumstances for the non-compete agreement, the clause may be upheld. Such circumstances could include significant financial investment in employees, such as professional training. Numerous rulings by labor courts have required former employees to reimburse employers for breaching commitments to remain employed for a specified period after receiving professional training and subsequently joining a competing company.

Exposure to Trade Secrets and Its Impact on Non-Compete Clauses

When employees are receive knowledge of trade secrets during their employment, courts and labor tribunals may recognize the validity of a non-compete clause. Moreover, in these cases, employees may be obligated to honor non-compete terms even without an explicit clause in their employment contract. Employers, however, must meet specific legal conditions to enforce such obligations.

First, employers must prove that the information constitutes a trade secret protected under the Commercial Torts Law. Additionally, they must demonstrate a high likelihood that employees will use the trade secrets in a way that harms their former employer.

Additional Circumstances Supporting Non-Compete Clauses

Other circumstances may also justify restricting employees from competing with their former employers. For example, enhanced employment conditions or salary increases offered in exchange for a commitment to non-compete terms may justify such a clause. Each case is evaluated based on its specific circumstances. As a result, it is challenging to predict how courts and labor tribunals will treat a particular non-compete clause.

In some cases, the clause may be deemed unjustified and subsequently annulled or not enforced. In other instances, judges may reduce the duration of the agreed-upon non-compete period to make it reasonable under the circumstances. Recent rulings have shortened non-compete periods to just a few months.

Contact an Expert Labor Attorney

As illustrated, non-compete clauses in employment contracts raise numerous complex legal issues. Each case must be evaluated to determine whether the non-compete clause meets legal requirements. If you have legal questions regarding employment contracts or non-compete clauses, feel free to contact us. Our law firm specializes in labor law and represents both employees and employers on issues such as employment agreements, employee rights, severance pay, and more.

 :  :

03-3724722

055-9781688

office@lawoffice.org.il